A Luzerne County Council majority rejected a proposal asking voters if they want to study a possible change in the home rule government structure.
Councilwoman Kathy Dobash had proposed placing the question on the November ballot, saying changes are warranted and should be developed by an elected government study commission.
Only three other council members agreed with her stance at Tuesday’s meeting: Edward Brominski, Eileen Sorokas and Stephen A. Urban.
The remaining seven raised concerns about the timing and instead supported a plan for council’s strategic initiatives committee to consider home rule revisions that eventually could be put before voters.
Councilman Eugene Kelleher said he wants to discuss home rule “refinements” but believes the main focus should be on filling the manager position vacated by Robert Lawton’s departure at the end of 2015.
The citizen committee searching for the next top manager had urged the council to reject the ordinance, saying the timing may discourage some from applying.
Councilman Harry Haas said it takes time to undo problems created over decades.
The county’s customized home rule structure, implemented in January 2012, replaced a system in effect more than 150 years, putting 11 elected council members and an appointed manager in charge of decisions previously made by the three commissioners and several elected row officers.
Brominski said he is not trying to get rid of home rule but believes the current structure must be “polished up.” Dobash stressed she is not advocating a return to the old system.
However, assistant Solicitor Shannon Crake advised the council that an elected government study commission would have free rein to recommend returning to the prior government system, keeping home rule as is or altering the home rule structure.
Urban, a prior county commissioner, challenged claims that home rule is better and rattled off reasons, including the council’s inability to review job applications to verify the administration is hiring “the best” workers with no politics or favoritism.
He predicted people who want changes will end up obtaining signatures to get a question on the ballot.
In other business, county Correctional Division Head J. Allen Nesbitt made a surprise announcement around 10:30 p.m. that he has submitted his resignation, effective March 4, to accept another position outside the county.
Nesbitt was hired in May 2013 and is among eight division heads under home rule. The operational services division head also has been vacant since Tanis Manseau abruptly left the position in October.
The council also voted Tuesday to appoint Hazleton area attorney Christopher B. Slusser to fill a vacancy on the five-person manager search committee.
The council members also spent more than an hour heavily debating a proposed list of entities to receive a combined $65,000 of the county’s natural-gas recreation funding for 2016.
The council had invited municipalities and nonprofits to submit applications in November and received 19 requests seeking a combined $125,000.
A five-person review committee of two council members, the council clerk and two county Recreational Facilities Advisory Board members evaluated the applications in December and recommended funding for seven nonprofits and three municipalities.
Dobash, Urban, Sorokas and Brominski criticized the selection process, saying the two Recreational Facilities Advisory Board members were affiliated with some of the organizations recommended to receive funding. A board representative said members abstained from recommendations if they had a conflict of interest.
Haas said he invested time thoughtfully evaluating the application reviews and pointed out that he and some council members are completing an “inordinate amount” of the work while others “run their mouths.”
A council majority ended up reducing some allocations by $9,000, which means other unsuccessful applicants may be awarded money at a future council meeting.